Letters to the Editor: April 11, 2019

This letter is from Milton resident Martin Lundberg.

We are all looking forward to Vermont's reopening and returning to a state of normalcy after a difficult and turbulent year. I think most Vermonters would agree that the governor has exercised a consistent, measured response to the Covid-19 pandemic while avoiding the hysteria and grandstanding seen elsewhere.

He has often repeated two guiding principles, “Follow the Science” and “Protect the Most Vulnerable." By most measures Vermont has done well in fighting the pandemic and is often said to be first in the nation.

At a recent Covid briefing/press conference (May 18th), the governor made this observation: "Most everyone believes in the science until it conflicts with their fears, their ideology or their politics and then they don't believe in the science." Unfortunately this observation applies to more issues than just the Coronavirus pandemic.

I'm concerned that Vermont is on track to be a national leader on another issue that I find very troubling. While other states have sought to codify abortion rights into legislation, Vermont is on the verge of adopting an amendment to the state's constitution (Proposal 5, Article 22 Personal Reproductive Liberty) that guarantees the "right" to an abortion during the entire 9 months of pregnancy.

If this amendment is passed, a woman could choose to terminate the life of her child in utero for any reason, at any time, up to the very moment of birth. For any reason – whether it be embarrassment, inconvenience, financial stress, sex selection or disability, even a minor without parental consent or notification.

But are we "Following the Science?" A brief internet search of "fetal development” will indicate otherwise. The science tells us that from the very moment of conception a new and unique individual is created with a genetic fingerprint unique to anyone on the entire planet. Just a few weeks after conception, that unique genetic fingerprint is orchestrating the development of the brain, spinal cord, the heart and other vital organs.

A heartbeat can be detected as early as 6 weeks. At 12 weeks fingernails are formed, face is more developed, intestines are in the abdomen even though the baby in only about 2 1/2 inches long. By 20 weeks the baby's sexual organs are developing and the baby can move and hear.

This incredible development continues with amazing rapidity. The heart is pumping blood, the child can recognize the mother's voice, feel pain, sleep and dream. With the amazing advancements of our modern medical technology, premature babies born as early as 26 weeks have an opportunity to survive outside the womb. A recent news story reported a mother giving birth at 29 weeks in the middle of a Delta flight to Honolulu.

Will Vermont "follow the science?" Will Vermont "protect the most vulnerable?" Can the termination of a fully developed, viable child one moment before birth be "reproductive freedom", when the termination of that same life a moment after birth is a crime of murder? Do we want Vermont to be that kind of a leader?

Once Proposal 5 becomes part of the Vermont Constitution, any changes or restrictions would require a four-year process, with multiple votes by the Senate and House and a statewide referendum. It would be wise to take the advice many a parent has given to an adolescent on the verge of crazy TikTok challenge, “Stop! Think! Don't do anything stupid!”

I have a better idea. Vermont should be first in the nation in providing support, emotional, educational, financial and medical support for mothers who find themselves in a crisis pregnancy, who feel helpless and hopeless, with nowhere to turn. Vermonters could be proud of that leadership, and it would demonstrate our commitment to follow the science and protect the most vulnerable. We should also note that Vermont's aging population and declining school enrollments would reap the long term benefits of more Vermont children.

To quote our friend Horton the elephant, “A person's a person no mater how small."

Written By

Staff Writer

Bridget Higdon is a Staff Writer. She was previously the editor-in-chief of The Vermont Cynic, UVM's independent newspaper. She’s been published in Seven Days, Editor & Publisher and Vermont Vacation Guide. She likes to cook and explore Vermont by bike.


(1) comment

Lisa Rees

Thank you for your op-ed. I agree we should follow the science, but this isn’t about science. It is about a women’s right to have a choice about what happens to her body. I agree Vermont should lead the way in providing support to assist and support women who become pregnant. It is easy to judge a woman when they choose to end their pregnancy. But, I wonder how you, a man, would feel if it was your body the government was telling you what you could or could not do with it? I wonder how you would feel if the man who got you pregnant wasn’t around to financially and emotionally support you. Or, if your family abandoned you. Or if the child you were carrying had a serious birth defect. I believe abortion should be the last resort and we should be there to support a woman who chooses to have a child. And, I support a women’s decision not to have a child. What I do not support is the government telling me what I can and can not do with my body. And, who am I to judge a woman who makes one of the most painful decisions of her life? Instead I offer my support and compassion. Maybe there would be less abortion if we all did this?

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for taking part in our commenting section. We want this platform to be a safe and inclusive community where you can freely share ideas and opinions. Comments that are racist, hateful, sexist or attack others won’t be allowed. Just keep it clean. Do these things or you could be banned:

• Don’t name-call and attack other commenters. If you’d be in hot water for saying it in public, then don’t say it here.

• Don’t spam us.

• Don’t attack our journalists.

Let’s make this a platform that is educational, enjoyable and insightful.

Email questions to darkin@orourkemediagroup.com.

Share your opinion


Join the conversation

Recommended for you